|
Why students need to understand investing basics
Teaching students to take charge of their future
Chart 1 can help make some of these statistics more meaningful. It shows that the U.S. saving rate, which had ranged around 10 percent of income for many years before 1980, went into a steady decline in the early 1980s, plunging to nearly zero in 2008 before recovering somewhat to about 5 percent currently. (It is important to note that the U.S. definition of "saving rate" represents only the difference between personal income and personal spending, and does not include investments or the value of real estate owned.) The Chinese, with little in the way of a formal government pension plan, currently save about 25 percent of their income.
Now that you've gotten their attention (we hope) with this rather startling data, you can introduce some basic economic concepts. But it's not just about teaching students economic concepts. They also need to understand that they will not be able to count on their retirement being funded by company or government pensions in the future. They will have to provide for a significant amount of their income during retirement, and they will be in charge of how most of their retirement funds are invested. The first step, then, is to help students understand that learning about saving and investing is about them and their own lives. To begin to understand it, though, they will need to master four basic economic concepts: opportunity cost, the power of compounding, risk/return, and diversification. Opportunity cost The power of compounding
Huge advantage from starting early (saving $100/month from age 25 to age 35, assumes 8 percent return a year versus starting at age 35). High school students can do simple compounding exercises using different time and return assumptions. As opposed to becoming a professional athlete, celebrity, or hitting the lottery, saving and investing from an early age presents a very high probability path of accumulating a significant amount of wealth for retirement. Risk and return
Most high school students do not need to be able to calculate standard deviation, but they do need to understand that it refers to the degree of variation in returns. In the following table, for example, the long-term return from emerging market stocks has been about 10 percent, but that comes with a variation (one standard deviation) of 25 percent. This number tells us that about two-thirds of the time (68 percent, to be exact), returns from this asset class have been between –15 percent and +35 percent. To capture the range on more than 68 percent of the time, we would have to use two standard deviations, and the range of returns would be considerably wider.
This table also allows us to show students what it really means when we say that "lower risk means lower return." The lowest risk among these asset classes, the short-term Treasury bill, has provided only a 3.5 percent return over the long term. (It is even lower when we factor in inflation.) Diversification As soon as a young person starts bringing in income, he or she is ready to begin the process of saving and diversifying. The study of asset allocation can be complex; students may take multiple courses on it in college and graduate school. High school standards in many states, however, include identifying the major asset classes and being able to rank them by approximate level of risk. Chart 4 provides one way of visualizing asset classes by risk, with the lowest level of the pyramid including lower risk assets and the highest level representing higher risk assets.
Teaching that time itself is an asset The world of retirement planning has changed dramatically, even since the parents of today's students first learned about it. For high school students in today's economy, waiting until they are in their forties to start saving and investing would most likely leave them short of their retirement goals. It will be up to them to understand and take control of their own personal financial situation. The good news is that they have the irreplaceable luxury of time on their side, a luxury they cannot afford to waste. By Gary Tapp, director of economic education at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta March 31, 2011 |